Comparison of Network Security tools –NESSUS Vs NMAP

Vulnerability scanners are very essential in the field of Network Security. Although a lot of network security scanners have emerged recently, the competition between NESSUS and NMAP keep persisting now and then. Although both of them perform a great job and offers various features, the popularity competition keeps circulating over and over again ever since their invention. Thus the following essay gives a detailed content of both the significant highly secured network tools NESSUS and NMAP. Even the merits and demerits associated with both of these tools are widely discussed from the following.

Significance of Network security:
Computers connected in networks have started to replace our daily lives. The first module on network security has set the scene and outlines the principles of safety precautions to secure their networks. We will now go into more technical detail networks and address the principle knot of network security: how to interconnect networks? How to enable networks to exchange information and reduce the risk associated with this trade? These are most prompted questions in our mind.

The first step in securing a network is to identify its inflows and outflows. The fact that the flow is coming does not mean that the transmitted data is incoming. This theoretical module is responsible for public safety information systems, network administrators, project managers, and generally anyone who has to implement security solutions for networked applications. Its objective is to provide a general knowledge of the security of computer networks, to enable decision makers and designers to clearly identify the parties involved of their information system, and help them ask the right questions about the safety devices a computer network. For instance, maintaining the open positions communication ports of a protocol file sharing, while the latter is not used unnecessarily dangerous because it opens a potential attacker policy options.
NESSUS security enhancement:
Renaud Deraison introduced the NESSUS security of networking tool in the year 1998. This facility drove in lot of attractions across the global security systems. NESSUS is a vulnerability scanner networks Tenable Network Security. Compared to other vulnerability scanners, NESSUS has the distinction of being based on a client or server architecture and to be compatible with Windows and Linux. In addition, NESSUS stores and manages all security vulnerabilities through a system of plug-in. NESSUS is software that performs real attacks and presents the results of these attacks in a report. Its use can be double-edged. On the one hand, a security team can use it to scan its network in order to prevent intrusions and denial of service. On the other hand, a hacker can use it for dishonest purposes and take the opportunity to exploit the reported vulnerabilities.
The use command line to use NESSUS allows both Windows and Linux; schedule scans by the task scheduler and thus keeps the historical reports. Add to the person responsible for the safety of using these reports as log or to explore to create a dedicated security of its network software.
Features and Benefits of NESSUS:
The configuration management of NESSUS service is adapted to the client – server architecture. This configuration file is more complete than the client version. All configuration options specified in this file will override the options defined by the user. The NESSUS server is a daemon. With this configuration file management, the administrator can centralize the configuration NESSUS. Similarly, the server has a file to centralize the scanning rules. NESSUS will scan the ports of living machines with four internal port scanners, or external such as NMAP. By knowing that if NESSUS is optimized using its port scanners home, the scheduler can be started .It is therefore recommended to use NMAP for performance reasons for such instances.
The remote scan is a port scanner to NMAP. It identifies open ports and the type of network remote machines service. NESSUS version recognizes service by parsing the welcome banners or headers in the frame responses. To save time, NESSUS can have multiple instances of the client and server and can also launch multiple attacks simultaneously on the same machine. Similarly, it can launch attacks on multiple target hosts simultaneously.
To correct the problem of false positives due to the remote scan, NESSUS can perform a local scan. To perform a local scan, NESSUS logs locally on the machine and sends his attacks. Preferably, NESSUS to use a local user account with the most important rights of the machine for a maximum of tests may be valid. Among other things, we can know the subnet of the machine name or IP address, the communication protocol used and the type of vulnerability. What is especially interesting is the description of such vulnerability. This is the description that will be used by the security manager of a company to fix the vulnerability.
Demerits of NESSUS:
Since the use of NESSUS can be double-edged, it seems obvious to place the physical machine in a secure location. At the logical level, the NESSUS server security is more complex. For maximum safety, we should put the server in a local network unreachable from the outside. On the whole, the NESSUS server must define a security policy to control access. For now, NESSUS does not check the local security policies for remote systems. To perform its tests, NESSUS launches real attacks against target machines. It is therefore prudent to prevent this attack is by performing the scan on a time slot where the target machine is not afraid of losing data or by specifying in the configuration files that you want to perform a scan.
The remote scan has the disadvantage of generating false positives. That is to say that NESSUS can detect a security breach for example, on an obsolete service when a security patch is applied on the local machine to fix bugs in this version. This is the local scan that corrects this problem of false positive. There is a second drawback of this type of scanning: network overload.
NMAP Security scanning:

NMAP indicates potential weaknesses or actual material tested. It relies for this on the basis of known signatures on a wide range of system faults. NMAP Scanning is a method to discover ways of usable communications long time. The idea is to survey as many channels as possible and keep those accommodations listed or particularly useful. Several fields of advertising are based on this concept and force people to view distributing bulk emails is an almost perfect parallel to what we discussed. Just send a message in each mailbox and wait for replies to stretch your nets.

Some scanners require you to give a delay between sending packets. How do we know what to insert? We could obviously make pings, but it is heavy and again the response time of the host varies significantly when they are floods of queries. NMAP allows you to determine the best timeout. It also tries to maintain packet re-transmissions, etc., so that it can change the timeout for the scan. For root users, the best thing to do for a timeout is to turn on the internal function ping. In most cases NMAP implements a configurable number of transmissions for ports that do not respond.

Advantages of NMAP security:
NMAP, also known as, Network Mapper is a gratis plus open source licensed utility for system discovery in addition to security auditing. Lot of systems plus network administrators do find it beneficial for responsibilities such as system inventory, running repair upgrade schedules, plus monitoring host and service uptime. NMAP makes use of raw IP packets mostly in novel ways to find what hosts are available recently on the latched network, and what services such hosts are providing, and what operating systems (plus OS versions) they are in fact running, and what sort of packet filters in addition to firewalls are in use, plus dozens of other characteristics within. It was actually designed to frequently scan large networks, still works fine in opposition to single hosts. NMAP processes on all main computer operating systems, apart from official binary packages which are available for Linux, Windows, plus Mac OS X.

NMAP has been extensively used to scan big networks of accurately hundreds of thousands of systems across the orb. The chief goals of the NMAP set-up is to assist in making the Internet a lot more secure plus to offer administrators or hackers or auditors with an exceptional tool for exploring their counterpart networks. While NMAP arrives with no contract, it is very well supported by a lively population of users and developers.
Disadvantages of NMAP:
From a user perspective, the NMAP interpreter is used only for phase debug scripts. To test the script on a machine, the user must enter the specific command for the function to start. The description field can generate the description of the security hole tested the script. This is the same description that will be used to install a patch and this is again confusion. The description field is called automatically if the security flaw has been detected or when manually by using the interpreting option. To test this critical security vulnerability, NMAP has several bookstores and hence organizing lot of bookstores is again a complexity.
Overall comparison summary between NESSUS and NMAP:
Both of these tools of network security are very important for ideal purposes in various scenarios and hence it’s our duty to use them appropriately in the determined timings. Although both these system have pros and cons under their system, the benefits of using them always overweigh the demerits. Once identified the incoming and outgoing network, it is generally possible to group devices according to some broad categories equipment. We can, for example distinguish intranet, that is to say all the machine in the network infrastructure of a company, the extranet is to say all machines the company could access from outside to inside information using both these tools in a typical manner.

Network protection is achieved with safety equipment such as NESSUS and NMAP. Their role is to ensure that only flows identified in the previous step transit between different parts of the network. IN the case of the Internet Company’s server that is available from the Internet, both NESSUS and NMAP are considered again. It is useless, so harmful, that the flow of consultation penetrates to the heart of the intranet. It will be much safer to position the server between two systems that limit the flow between the server and the intranet and the Internet and the server. Both of them function in a similar way as a firewall which constitutes a network that processes flow at the protocol level, usually TCP / IP device. They will therefore be able to guarantee the direction of data flow and limit the flow to those provided. To protect the equipment against data streams that could be malicious, NESSUS and NMAP servers are used as well in order to enhance protection.

For instance, when visiting a website for a client, it may happen that the downloaded pages contain malicious code, using for example anomalies leading to misinterpretation of the client. In some cases, these errors of interpretation can lead to attacks against the client, which is yet to initiate the connection. To prevent these malicious codes are interpreted by the client, we can use either NESSUS or NMAP to be submitted to the application server, and perform the processing of the response received. They are used to minimize the consequences of a compromise of one or the other network components.

Even when a network is secure defensively, its real security depends on the continuous monitoring that he carries. A perfect tool like NMAP or NESSUS helps to protect vulnerable components known attacks by intercepting them before they reach their target. Defense in depth network requires a good preventive strategy for thinking networks and their interconnections securely. This NESSUS or NMAP approach must be completed once so that the network operation will be able to detect abnormalities that may be indicative of successful attacks and repair networks in this case. Thus the crucial factors of the network security tools are discussed.

3 thoughts on “Comparison of Network Security tools –NESSUS Vs NMAP

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Enable Google Transliteration.(To type in English, press Ctrl+g)
WordPress spam blocked by CleanTalk.